green news and opinion, and an organic eco directory that focuses on organic and eco-friendly products.
urban sprout featuresgreen news and opinion, and an organic eco directory that focuses on organic and eco-friendly products. urban sprout newslettergreen, eco & organic news what we've got to say
activism
art
building
climate change
community
conservation
eating out
energy
ethical consumer
events
foodie
from the earth
genetically modified
giy - grow it yourself
green101
green guides
greening it up
health
kids
markets
organic
permaculture
places to stay
pollution
recycle
reviews
transport
travel
urban legends
water
read our green guidesgreen your baby sa green blogs
User login |
are you sussed or sassi about your fish?Submitted by turbosprout on Tue, 2007-07-03 10:56
I'd heard of the Marine Stewardship Council which is an international conservation initiative, but didn't know that there was a local program underway to educate consumers and those in the fish trade about sustainable eating options. I enjoy my fish, but must admit that when eating out I don't really think about where the fish I'm trying comes from, how it was caught, whether it was purchased legally, if it is a species that is endangered because of overfishing etc. Well, now thanks to SASSI, I'll be able to make an informed choice. They've produced a pocket sized guide that can be downloaded from their website along with a larger informational booklet. They also have an SMS service which will let you know whether...it's a good idea to tuck in to the fish you're thinking of eating. SASSI's key message is that not all seafood is equal and that we need to be informed sea-food lovers to ensure that there is a health supply available in future. A 2002 report on worldwide fish stocks estimated that 47% of total stocks are fully exploited, 18% over exploited and 10% are depleted (unlikely to recover). From the EWT website:
You can SMS the name of the fish you're thinking of tucking into to 079 499 8795 and you'll get a response of either Red, Orange or Green. Yellowfin tuna:Green, Bigeye tuna:ORANGE, Longfin tuna:Green, Skipjack tuna:Green, Bluefin tuna:ORANGE, Atlantic bonito:Green Now all I need to know is my Bigeye from my Skipjack and it'll be plain sailing! ( categories: )
|
|
Sustainable seafood in South Africa
The Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) is an international non-profit that developed an environmental standard for sustainable wild-capture fisheries. Fisheries are assessed against this standard by independent certifiers. If the fishery meets this standard the seafood may carry the MSC’s blue eco-label.
You can find out where to buy MSC-labelled seafood in South Africa by checking http://eng.msc.org/html/content_1183.htm.
Link you provide does not
Link you provide does not exist
Green means buy. Means
Green means buy. Means profit. I cannot after so many notifications from Greenpeace understand how nearly all tuna reports came in green from SASSI. From what I've understood, most types of tuna are DANGEROUSLY close to collapse. I will do further homework on this, but I am so cynical that it's possibly the same abuse we see many corporations or organisations involved in: that of dis/misinformation. Or worse, that 'green' is considered alright until only a couple of years away from complete doom, when it changes to 'orange'! I mean, let's face it - at the rate we're all going, ideally NO-ONE eats fish for 5 years (at least?) in order to allow for proper replenishment to occur. I don't eat fish more than once a month due to minimisation of my consumption. As said, I'm looking into this tuna issue after seeing it sold at Woolworths (without sticker - I actually had to ask and was horrified with results).
Oh and mmust add that I only
Oh and mmust add that I only eat farmed fish. Heard it's not as perfect for the environment as one would ideally like and one also ingests hormones, but I would rather this than my reliance on dwindling wild stock. So even if tuna truly is considered on the green list, I'll still not buy it.
'A 2002 report on worldwide
'A 2002 report on worldwide fish stocks estimated that 47% of total stocks are fully exploited, 18% over exploited and 10% are depleted (unlikely to recover).
Do all you people eating fish with a 'green' sticker honestly believe that if you continue, that fish won't inevitably become more threatened and change status? I do. By eating any fish that's 'optimally exploited' you're contributing towards it's decline. It cannot be sustainable when there's pure profit involved. Every single fish species in the wild will inevitably collapse. It's just like global warming, we're right on the edge, but most still fly to a destination whenever they can on a whim, irrespective of consequences. Why am I so cynical that fish stocks can recover? Because global warming was exposed decades ago and only now are the smallest of changes occurring. When profit butts heads with conservation, the former seems to win.