green news and opinion, and an organic eco directory that focuses on organic and eco-friendly products.
urban sprout featuresgreen news and opinion, and an organic eco directory that focuses on organic and eco-friendly products. urban sprout newslettergreen, eco & organic news what we've got to say
activism
art
building
climate change
community
conservation
eating out
energy
ethical consumer
events
foodie
from the earth
genetically modified
giy - grow it yourself
green101
green guides
greening it up
health
kids
markets
organic
permaculture
places to stay
pollution
recycle
reviews
transport
travel
urban legends
water
read our green guidesgreen your baby sa green blogs
User login |
greening it up – thurs 22 mar 07Submitted by sproutingforth on Thu, 2007-03-22 12:58
Fluoride in our water – only 37% of us say ‘no’ The government controversially plans to dose public drinking water supplies with fluoride, although these plans have now been delayed, pending further research – including the effects on human health and the environment. [IOL] Fluoride has been tied to bone cancer, lower IQs and osteoporosis, so why is it being added to water? [prevention.com] If you drink it, you are running the risk of all kinds of toxic actions – an interview with Dr Arvid Carlsson. [fluoride action network] And an interesting read [vernoncoleman.com] Pollute the stratosphere with sulphur compounds – a radical end to global warming? James Lovelock spoke at the House of Commons last week about the world having ‘passed the point of no return’ but despite the doom & gloom there was a ray of hope (what’s a little acid rain between countries) - a little depraved or far-fetched? Read for yourselves [times] ( categories: )
|
|
geo-engineering
I think that most of these "geo-engineering" proposals to supposedly deal with global warming are very scary and I also think Lovelock has entirely lost the plot...
If the main problem regarding climate change is excessive anthropogenic CO2 emissions, the most logical thing to do is to reduce those emissions (it's the stop-what-you're-doing principle). Surely, fancy techno-fixes with unknown and unpredictable side-effects are not the answer, especially in the long run.
There are many established, feasible and sustainable ways to achieve emission reductions (energy efficiency and renewable energy sources, in particular)
Andreas