Please vote again for us to win the Best Green Blog award. Woooohoo!
we're a finalist - thanks to you!urban sprout featuresgreen news and opinion, and an organic eco directory that focuses on organic and eco-friendly products. what we've got to sayactivism
art
building
climate change
community
conservation
eating out
energy
ethical consumer
events
foodie
from the earth
genetically modified
giy - grow it yourself
green guides
greening it up
health
kids
markets
organic
permaculture
places to stay
pollution
recycle
reviews
transport
travel
urban legends
water
read our green guidesgreen your baby SearchSA Green bloggers
Latest listingsUser login |
putting a cork in itSubmitted by sproutingforth on Tue, 2009-01-27 11:14.
I admit that when I first read about this bundling of cork closures and the environment, I was a little sceptical. Weren’t we trying to phase out cork closures? Just how environmentally friendly are they, really? But it appears that my scepticism is redundant. A recent study of the environmental impact of cork, plastic and aluminium screwcap stoppers has found what is already widely accepted: cork is the most environmentally-friendly stopper. [decanter.com] Cork is renewable, recyclable and biodegradable. The report, undertaken by PricewaterhouseCoopers, found plastic stoppers, including the plastic capsule that goes over the top of the bottle, are nine times more damaging to the environment - and aluminium screwcaps are twenty-two times - than cork stoppers, including corks with a plastic capsule. But I digress. Columbit, who supplies packaging and processing to the wine, food and beverage industries in SA, has recently joined the UN Global Compact, a non-profit agency set up to guarantee sustainable growth and good corporate citizenship. One of the ten principles the compact addresses is environmental responsibility. To tackle this Columbit has set up a spekboom nursery in the Wellington winelands. By giving their clients a spekboom to decorate their tasting rooms, Columbit hope to promote awareness of the spekboom’s ability to absorb enormous amounts of carbon and why this is so important for the environment. A further feather in Columbit’s cap in this regard, is their partnership with the Department of Water Affairs and Forestry: Working for Water Programme and R3G, to enable additional funding to plant more trees. The long term benefits will be greater carbon absorption and the creation of jobs in caring for the trees. ( categories: )
|
|
zero net impact?
I've read about the spekboom's ability to absorb CO2, but does planting them really help in the long run? What is the life expectancy of a porkbush? The problem that I see is that there is no end product that is made from them, and therefore they eventually die, degrade and release CO2 back into the atmosphere (my understanding of the CO2 cycle may be flawed). Even if the plant lives for 50 years, then in 50 years the net CO2 is zero. If we plant trees which can be made into products (wooden windows, doors, furniture, houses, etc.) then we trap the carbon for an extended periods.
positive net effect?
I'm not sure what the lifespan of spekboom is, but in the article we read a farmer had planted some spekboom stands 27 years ago and these were still around for the research to be based on. The article claims the carbon capture capability to be equivalent to tropical rainforest! They grow a lot faster than tropical hardwoods which are being felled for building material e.g. maranti, okoume. Once a tree is felled unless replaced, the net carbon capture will decrease. Spekboom also helps to rehabilitate the veld in areas where they naturally occur, do not need additional watering, provide food for game, propagate themselves etc. I think if the net stocks of spekboom are increasing that will have a positive effect on CO2 capture, especially as other natural carbon / CO2 sinks (rainforest) are diminishing globally.