green news and opinion, and an organic eco directory that focuses on organic and eco-friendly products.
urban sprout featuresgreen news and opinion, and an organic eco directory that focuses on organic and eco-friendly products. urban sprout newslettergreen, eco & organic news what we've got to say
activism
art
building
climate change
community
conservation
eating out
energy
ethical consumer
events
foodie
from the earth
genetically modified
giy - grow it yourself
green101
green guides
greening it up
health
kids
markets
organic
permaculture
places to stay
pollution
recycle
reviews
transport
travel
urban legends
water
read our green guidesgreen your baby sa green blogs
User login |
un study: organic farming reduces poverty in africaSubmitted by sproutingforth on Thu, 2008-10-23 13:51
An analysis of 114 projects in 24 African countries found that yields had more than doubled where organic, or near-organic practices had been used. That increase in yield jumped to 128 per cent in east Africa. The research conducted by the UN Environment Programme, suggests that organic, small-scale farming can deliver the increased yields which were thought to be the preserve of industrial farming, without the environmental and social damage which that form of agriculture brings with it. The study found that organic practices outperformed traditional methods and chemical-intensive conventional farming. It also found... strong environmental benefits such as improved soil fertility, better retention of water and resistance to drought. And the research highlighted the role that learning organic practices could have in improving local education. Backers of GM foods insist that a technological fix is needed to feed the world. But this form of agriculture requires cash to buy the patented seeds and herbicides – both at record high prices currently – needed to grow GM crops. Regional farming experts have long called for "good farming", rather than exclusively GM or organic. Better seeds, crop rotation, irrigation and access to markets all help farmers. Organic certification in countries such as the UK and Australia still presents an insurmountable barrier to most African exporters, the report points out. It calls for greater access to markets so farmers can get the best prices for their products. A combination of increasing population, decreasing rainfall and soil fertility and a surge in food prices has left Africa uniquely vulnerable to famine. Climate change is expected to make a bad situation worse by increasing the frequency of droughts and floods. It has been conventional wisdom among African governments that modern, mechanised agriculture was needed to close the gap but efforts in this direction have had little impact on food poverty and done nothing to create a sustainable approach. Now, the global food crisis has led to renewed calls for a massive modernisation of agriculture on the hungriest continent on the planet, with calls to push ahead with genetically modified crops and large industrial farms to avoid potentially disastrous starvation. Last month the UK's former chief scientist Sir David King said anti-scientific attitudes among Western NGOs and the UN were responsible for holding back a much-needed green revolution in Africa. "The problem is that the Western world's move toward organic farming – a lifestyle choice for a community with surplus food – and against agricultural technology in general and GM in particular, has been adopted across the whole of Africa, with the exception of South Africa, with devastating consequences," he said. The research conducted by the UN Environment Programme suggests that organic, small-scale farming can deliver the increased yields which were thought to be the preserve of industrial farming, without the environmental and social damage which that form of agriculture brings with it. [independent] ( categories: )
|
|
great news
this is great news! whenever locking horns with folks about the whole gm debate, the one thing I always come back to, is that whatever the pros and cons may appear to be, it's still not solving what i see as the main problem of modern agriculture: the stripping of the land of all nutrients without putting anything back. modifying plants to increase their nutritive value instead of building up the soil the vitamins and minerals are supposed to come from seems to me like a rather bizarre way of going about it.
intuition and scientific proof
Intuitively we just know that organic food, grown more in tune with nature, has to be better for planet and human health, so it's great to see more scientific evidence supporting what is really just common sense. A technocentric GM approach cannot solve all our ills. Like you say, GM and industrial agriculture is not putting anything back into the soil, only stripping it of it's capacity to support life. I can tell you've been on Pat's Soil for Life course!
thanks!
thanks for posting this. going to source the article now and stick it in my thesis quickly. this has come just in time, my thesis is due in a week and a bit! :)
in the nick of time!
I've not read the study but it sounds like a comprehensive one, by a credible source, so should fit in nicely with your thesis. Good timing!
Excellent!
This is brilliant news! When i was in SA and doing philanthropic projects in W Cape, some schools were encouraged onto this route, with great success. I am returning in a few weeks( with loads more experience and awareness) and am looking at reaching out to communties and groups to support living sustainably and in harmony with the environment.This is the eradication of poverty.When we are able to nurture the land and its resources,we take ownership of our lives and support each other. We step out of the vicious CON-sumer cycle that serves a few at the top of the money-chain. Back to basics...keep it simple,easy and fun is a great antidote to poverty and pessimism.
Thank you for sharing the important article and well done on a fabulous website!
Ngiyabonga!
Source
I saw this article from the Independent come up in my feed and I was surprised that there is no reference to the name of the study and no link to the study online.
I wanted to look into it some more to try and get a handle on what the study incorporated, but it doesn't seem possible with the limited info given. Unless you all know something I don't?
here's the link
The Independent sure didn't make it easy. I had to do some sleuthing, but I found the payload:
http://www.unep.ch/etb/publications/insideCBTF_OA_2008.pdf
Link
Thanks, well done on finding that. I'll dive into it first chance I get.